We're drifting.. we need material update, stat! I was surprised Richard had to provide a hole drilled lower.. am I right then to assume they might have a non drilled Mac Lower at the ATF-TB? If so I wonder about the extent of their toys.. maybe just more common stuff? Mac lowers, a milspec M16 receiver? I doubt their toy box is too extensive.. I'd like to see all the items they've rejected!
We all have different skills. Sorry I don't have that skill.
Post however you like. I was simply expressing that I had a hard time making out what you meant. Good for you that you have done so well with a limited formal education. I was not trying to disparage you, simply to let you know I didn't understand because with a lack of punctuation and capitalization. I did not want to assume what you meant and was hoping you would take the time to have a little more clarity in your post.
By your response I'm guessing you have no interest in my thoughts as far a a belt fed option with the Lage upper as presented so far. I'm not looking to debate as to how we might stack up financial. Nor do I want to engage in the "I was born a poor black child" debate. I thought the whole point to this forum is the exchange of ideas and information. I simply tried to express to you that because of the way you posted I didn't understand. But again, post however you want. That must have been hard to leave school so young.
To Mr. Lage: How is testing going? The last I heard on July 4th you had a ruling on the design. Any changes required that testing had shown?
Scott
The hole for the MAX-11/15 looks like it is within .020" to .030" of the Sabre hole. We are using a smaller diameter operating rod, so it may clear the existing hole.
This thread has become long and sidetracked with the same questions being asked over and over. A new thread will be started when relevant information becomes available.
Chris Hipes
Hipes Consulting Services LLC
FFL/SOT 07/02
poulan10takethisoutsoidonotgetmorespam@yahoo.com
North Texas