A Sad Update For The Tenko 10-16

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
2,960
Location
Southern New Hampshire
You guys are certainly entitled to your opinion. Worthless or not, we are going through the process. Does it suck to send a transferable? Absolutely, as it will cost over $300 in shipping and insurance costs. This also messes with our plan for the M11/NINE. I bought a couple of M10s as there were multiple manufacturers. It also allows side by side evaluations. I only have one M11/NINE. When we had six units made for testing, one of those was sent to the FATD to get the clock started. Then I tested one unit. Since my unit did well, we sent the other three units out to Beta testers for 10,000 rounds of use with each. With only one M11/NINE, I will have to hold off shipping to the FATD until my unit has testing completed. This is the way it is now, so we will have to work within this framework. I'm not happy with it, but like I said, becoming a 07 is part of the plan, but it is not planned for now.

Scott
Manager A&S Conversions L.L.C.
 

gun.bro

Well-known member
Feedback: 4 / 0 / 0
Joined
Nov 22, 2017
Messages
192
Either way, just keep us updated. I’m #16 on the list. Patiently waiting.

Thx
 

Vegas SMG

UZI Talk Life Member,
Feedback: 132 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Messages
14,509
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
In the unlikely event the Tenko does not receive approval this time around, how would customers feel if they paid for a unit only to discover they owned contraband. What a cluster fuck that situation would be for everyone involved.

Doing things correctly isn’t always the easiest or most profitable way, but it’s usually best for everyone involved.
 

twzadms

Well-known member
Feedback: 2 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jan 17, 2014
Messages
149
I am baffled by people stating it should go to market before determination letter. Clearly risk is not something that concerns them at all. Personally after Akins and so many other accessories getting determination letters that they are a conversion device. I think that the personal and professional exposure of bringing something to market is completely dismissed by those who are unwilling to undertake such an endeavor. I would like to thank every individual that has driven the advances in this platform. To focus on a limited market with so many restrictions is appreciated, clearly a passion that has as much financial peril as opportunity.
 

cjsoccer3

Well-known member
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Joined
Oct 21, 2015
Messages
522
Location
Northern Virginia
That’s okay! The demand for the Tenko is going to be just as alive 120 days following. If it took a year I’d still be more than happy.
 
W

Walksalone

Guest
Like a lot of things in life... if it was easy everyone would do it.
 

jdonovan

Active member
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
39
I would think that not being a SOT and submitting a potential accessory for determination would be a potentially dangerous situation. If the determination came back that an accessory was a MG, wouldn't that make the submitter in possession of a unregistered MG at time of submission?

I know it hasn't in the past, but with the way things are changing at the agency, I could see this as a whole new way to to discourage submissions.
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
2,960
Location
Southern New Hampshire
I would think that not being a SOT and submitting a potential accessory for determination would be a potentially dangerous situation. If the determination came back that an accessory was a MG, wouldn't that make the submitter in possession of a unregistered MG at time of submission?

I know it hasn't in the past, but with the way things are changing at the agency, I could see this as a whole new way to to discourage submissions.

Just to be clear, such a new device being submitted is not anything until there was a determination. So if a submitted device is determined to be a machinegun, it is not a machinegun until the determination. So the submitter was never in possession of the "machinegun". The determination of an item to be a machinegun would stop the FATD from shipping the newly determined "machinegun" from being shipped back, but would have no penalty for the creator.

Shipping one of our transferable M10 RR machineguns to the FATD with a complete adapter system with upper will certainly more expensive. I would have liked to have some notice, instead of "Oh we don't make determinations anymore of an accessory without the complete firearm". I would have appreciated some notice, like "We will no longer make accessory determinations without the complete firearm after this date..." I agree that requiring the complete firearm to make an accessory determination, especially for a Registered Receiver machinegun will certainly cut down on submissions. I think that it will also complicate things at the FATD. They will need to make sure they keep the firearms straight. What kind of a problem would it be for two owners to receive the wrong machinegun? Or even worse, a machinegun gets misplaced?

For those of you keeping track, we have not received the adapter back from FATD. We are planning to pack another complete unit off this week. Hopefully like a problem with a Form, when the FATD receives the complete adapter system with RR, they will do the evaluation right away. Time will tell. We will certainly keep everyone up on developments as we get information.

Scott
Manager A&S Conversions L.L.C.
 
W

Walksalone

Guest
I want to play. If you have to have a machine gun to make the adapter work like a machine gun then perhaps they will determine that it takes a machine gun to make a machine gun.
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
2,960
Location
Southern New Hampshire
The real key is that the Tenko adapter is an accessory, not a firearm. So there is only one firearm (the M10 RR) firing more than one round per pull of the trigger.

Scott
Manager A&S Conversions L.L.C.
 

mit

Member
Feedback: 2 / 0 / 0
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
18
Absolutely, as it will cost over $300 in shipping and insurance costs.

Use USPS registered mail. Much cheaper than anything else. From New Hampshire to Needy with a $8000 value would be around $50.

Mit Matelske
Rugu LLC
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
2,960
Location
Southern New Hampshire
Use USPS registered mail. Much cheaper than anything else. From New Hampshire to Needy with a $8000 value would be around $50.

Mit Matelske
Rugu LLC

Is that just for just the lower? What did you use for the size and weight of the box? I am guessing a 16"x6"x12" box with a return shipment box on the inside, weighing 14lbs with the M10, Tenko adapter, stock, and 10.5" upper with 10,000.00 insurance. A friend estimated that it would be a little over $160 each way. Maybe I will get a pleasant surprise at the Post Office and it'll be cheaper.

Scott
Manager A&S Conversions L.L.C.
 
W

Walksalone

Guest
I won’t ever use the USPS again for anything firearm. Caveat Emptor!
 

b_saan

Well-known member
Feedback: 7 / 0 / 0
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
400
I won’t ever use the USPS again for anything firearm. Caveat Emptor!

Then you must not do much firearm business. USPS Priority is absolutely the most reliable shipping method for all things firearms. You should always have your own business insurance to cover your shipments though as none of the shipping companies handle insurance claims well.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top