A Sad Update For The Tenko 10-16

rybread

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 6 / 0 / 0
Joined
May 10, 2015
Messages
3,296
Location
U.S. F'N A
Are we STILL beating this to death?

Surely by the end of the week? Maybe two.

No one likes the waiver idea - how about an “Undetermined Products Co LLC” licenses the design and manufacturers these things to sell under a waiver- to get some out in the wild while generating cash flow? “Undetermined Co” could do this for all the products waiting on the ATF. Just spitballing here, it’s a free country- if anyone dislikes that, flights to China should resume at some point.
 

Jmacken37

Mr. Miata, Moderator, UZI Talk Life Member,
Staff member
Feedback: 103 / 0 / 0
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Messages
5,272
Location
SE MI
The costs of becoming an FFL 07 for 3 years of license is way less than your single month payment expense. And the concept of “risking your personal firearm collection” if your FFL is home-based is based on what?... you just have to store your personal firearms separately from FFL inventory, or at least label/tag them as personal if stored together... the ATF makes that part easy.

All of my guns are for sale. No need to label or separate. :)
 

Gaujo

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 10 / 0 / 1
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
4,433
Location
Raleigh, NC
I say let's get down to brass tacks. The basis of law is what a common man would think. A common man would think that if they approved a plastic version, they'd have to approve a metal version of the exact same thing. If it were myself in the pot, I'd sell it with a copy of the plastic version letter. I believe that would cover you as having made reasonable decisions were this to go to court. But again, that's just my:2cents
 
Last edited:

Concorde

Moderator, UZI Talk Life Member,
Feedback: 71 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
2,783
Location
North Alabama
All of my guns are for sale. No need to label or separate. :)

If you have an FFL, that means that you'd have to transfer all of your previously owned firearms to the FFL business and put them into the Acquisition/Disposition Book and then they'd also be part of your computation for the business's Personal Property Taxes each year. Not the most cost effective-way to deal with it. We've found it best (at least in my situation) to keep them separated. :)
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,047
Location
Southern New Hampshire
I say let's get down to brass tacks. The basis of law is what a common man would think. A common man would think that if they approved a plastic version, they'd have to approve a metal version of the exact same thing. If it were myself in the pot, I'd sell it with a copy of the plastic version letter. I believe that would cover you as having made reasonable decisions were this to go to court. But again, that's just my:2cents

But there is the rub, going to court. I am staying afloat right now. Even if I had to wait another five or six months would be another $10,000 or $12,000. What would the retainer be for a lawyer to defend me in Federal court? My guess would be two or three times that on top of our fixed costs. It is not necessarily about who is right or wrong, but who has deep enough pockets to see it to the end. That is not a position I would want to be in.

Scott
Manager A&S Conversions L.L.C.
 

alex4922

Well-known member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Oct 6, 2015
Messages
49
Location
NE Georgia
Tenko

I've not followed too closely the development of your adapter. I've watched the videos and I'm on the waiting list. I understand that the plastic trial version would not stand up to prolonged use but is there another formula plastic that would? What about a plastic version with reinforcement al la Glock?
 

skoda

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
994
Scott,

What does your lawyer say about your personal responsibility to any BATFE suit against A&S Conversion LLC for selling MG's? What does your lawyer say about the need for a determination in metal verses polymer? You have a lawyer for this right!!!!! Expensive as it may be they would be cheaper than paying rent on a building that you aren't using for a year or more.
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,047
Location
Southern New Hampshire
I've not followed too closely the development of your adapter. I've watched the videos and I'm on the waiting list. I understand that the plastic trial version would not stand up to prolonged use but is there another formula plastic that would? What about a plastic version with reinforcement al la Glock?

The short answer is, if we submit a new design then we go to the back of the line and restart the whole determination process from the beginning.

Scott,

What does your lawyer say about your personal responsibility to any BATFE suit against A&S Conversion LLC for selling MG's? What does your lawyer say about the need for a determination in metal verses polymer? You have a lawyer for this right!!!!! Expensive as it may be they would be cheaper than paying rent on a building that you aren't using for a year or more.

As far as my personal responsibility if A&S Conversions was to sell Post Sample machineguns, he felt that both my wife and I could be charged. His specialty is business law in our home state. I could pursue a NFA specific lawyer's advice. The RKIs that I have asked all seem to think that my wife and I, the responsible persons of our FFL, could be charged. It doesn't mean that we would. That would be up to the Federal prosecutor.

I didn't ask about the materials change as that was not his specialty. To find a NFA specific lawyer about the materials change when resubmition fo materials change was stated. As far as the rental, getting a manufacturing FFL has always been part of the plan. Several RKIs suggested getting the FFL as the FATD has been more responsive to FFL holders than private individuals. Again, if we got a determination of the aluminum adapter being an accessory tomorrow, there would not be a problem. But when will we receive such a determination, I don't know. About the time we paid to get out of the lease and returned the FFL, would be about the time we would get the determination of the aluminum version is an accessory.

There is an endless list of things we could do. What we plan to do is tread water until we have the determination that would allow us to sell the units we have already made. To those that think we should come to market now, we don't think that would be the right thing to do until we have the determination that the aluminum version that we have can be sold as an accessory. To those that support that path, thank you. For those that don't, put up your own money to bring your product to market any way you see fit. I have way too much money in this to try and change boats in midstream. YMMV.

Scott
Manager A&S Conversions L.L.C.
 

sniperdoc

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 2 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Messages
5,438
Location
TN
Would getting your FFL now even help the Tenko problem, given that your Tenko submission would substantially predate your FFL?
I have no clue what a dozen or so hours of an NFA Attorney's fee would cost, but it might be worth checking out. I would assume that they will give you a $/hr over the phone, like other Attorneys.
 

Fishman

Well-known member
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
589
What we plan to do is tread water until we have the determination that would allow us to sell the units we have already made.
IF you get a determination. The ATF has no obligation to provide one. I hope they do, but your assumption that they absolutely will provide one confuses me.

Also, the determination does not allow you to sell your inventory. You can legally sell your inventory today. The determination is something you want, not something you legally need.

I wish you the best. Hopefully you get a determination asap.
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,047
Location
Southern New Hampshire
IF you get a determination. The ATF has no obligation to provide one. I hope they do, but your assumption that they absolutely will provide one confuses me.

Also, the determination does not allow you to sell your inventory. You can legally sell your inventory today. The determination is something you want, not something you legally need.

I wish you the best. Hopefully you get a determination asap.

You are correct. If there is no determination, then we would not be selling Post Sample machineguns. But there would also be no cash flow. We would need to hold onto the money until we actually did get a determination. We already floated the idea of a release form. A total of four units could be sold as that was the number of buyers willing to sign away their recourse if there was a determination issue. I don't even know if such a release would be legal. For the sale of four units, I never sought out a NFA lawyer to find out.

So if we sold all of the units today and we get a determination three months from now that the Tenko adapter is a firearm/machinegun, then we could be facing hundreds of thousands of dollars in civil litigation and whatever the BATF&E decides to throw at us for criminal charges. Criminal charges mean defense in Federal court. Which gets us right back to tens of thousands of dollars more in expenses with no profits to pay for it. Could we sell units without a determination that the Tenko adapter is not a firearm or machinegun? Yes, but doing so could bankrupt us. If it doesn't make dollars then it doesn't make sense. At 60 I'm not interested in facing bankruptcy.

There are lots of things we "could" do. Taking on more risk than we already have is not something we will do.

Scott
Manager A&S Conversions L.L.C.
 

Deerhurst

Registered User
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Messages
1,258
Location
USA
Just went through this thread. Christ! Makes me dislike the ATF even more than I already did! They seem to be living up to the useless beaurocrats name a coworker has given them. This is also making me dread sending in the F4 I am currently waiting for responsible persons forms for. Who knows how many decades that'll take to come back!

I wish you the best. At this time I am 100% in for buying one of your adapters and I havnt even mailed the F4 for my Mac yet! I sincerely hope they get their act together and give you a thumbs up ASAP!
 

cjsoccer3

Well-known member
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Joined
Oct 21, 2015
Messages
522
Location
Northern Virginia
Random, but is Lage facing these same issues? I’d presume this is all across the board. Lage hasn’t had anything determined on since pre-Tenko I believe.
 

mattnh

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 9 / 0 / 0
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
1,244
Location
NH
Just read something interesting in the latest issue of
Small Arms Review pg 96.
Column by Jeff Folloder NFATCA Exec Director
Says that DOJ has restricted providing <any>
Industry guidance. ATF acknowledged needing
To update the NFA Handbook, but said they
couldn’t. Said there might be a future column
Covering the topic...


Matt
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,047
Location
Southern New Hampshire
Thank you for the update Matt. Of course until there is an actual notification that there will be no more Industrial guidance, I don't think that will change anything for A&S Conversions L.L.C.

Scott
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,047
Location
Southern New Hampshire
After reading the column in SAR, there was one line stating that "Unfortunately, with current Department of Justice restrictions on providing industry guidance (a topic which will require an entire column on its own), there is no real possibility of an update [of the NFA Handbook],on the near term horizon. " It seems obvious to me that since the Slidefire debacle, the DOJ has decided that if no industrial guidance is given then the Government can't be sued for erroneous guidance. I have heard all kinds of rumors. The FATD is overwhelmed with brace submissions, the FATD had most of their Examiners transferred to other departments and new examiners are being trained, or the legal Department of the ATF is overwhelmed. What is the truth, I don't know.

Obviously, very little has come out from the FATD. I certainly wish I had submitted the aluminum version earlier. But I didn't. What if the FATD goes back to calling everything a machinegun? I have seen the pictures of the RPD upper in a vice held together with zip ties and whatever else they used to make a receiver. I am in this too deep to walk away. By the same token, I would rather not spend the other half of my net worth fighting with the ATF. We are able to maintain our current level of expenses.

The system is broken. This thread is about the Tenko. As the manager of A&S Conversions L.L.C., I have no intention to take on the Government if we can help it. If you think otherwise, please make your own thread to complain about it. Thank you Matt for the information. It still is just rumor and conjecture. I still have not seen anything official from the FATD, ATF, or DOJ. Hopefully there will be something concrete so. I either need a positive determination to sell the Tenko or official word from the FATD that there will no longer be determinations issued.

Scott
Manager A&S Conversions L.L.C.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top