Good news on my facebook!

MACchat

Well-known member
Feedback: 14 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
431
Location
Virginia
IRM, here I come. Only thing I wish were avail from the factory was a barrel length option. Don’t mind paying $3k but a choice between a 10, 16, or 18-inch barrel would be a nice touch. Either way, thrilled this is happening.
 
W

Walksalone

Guest
I think I’m 611 or close. I’m going to pass. I’ll be playing with the briefcase that Concorde is making for me. Get me a suit and a tie. People be calling me sir. From ‘oh brother where art thou’.
 

STEVESKI

Well-known member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
67
IRM, here I come. Only thing I wish were avail from the factory was a barrel length option. Don’t mind paying $3k but a choice between a 10, 16, or 18-inch barrel would be a nice touch. Either way, thrilled this is happening.

Maybe I missed this, but what barrel length comes with the upper? I'm hoping it's in the 10" range, but the nice part is that it's cheap to change it out an can be done with normal tools at home. Also, the IRM seems like it should be the only available option. I must be missing something. Who would want to drill a hole and make switching back to 9mm difficult if there was no downside to the IRM version? I think we'll find out more when the patent is finalized and we can really see how it works.
 

Battering ram NIB

UZI Talk Supporter,
Feedback: 30 / 0 / 0
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
5,041
Congrats Richard

for the m11/a1 is it possible to use the IRM? i figure the gun is too small....or will you make the upper 2" longer to make it work?
 

chili17

Moderator, FFL/SOT, UZI Talk Life Member,
Staff member
Feedback: 64 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
6,950
Location
North Texas
Maybe I missed this, but what barrel length comes with the upper? I'm hoping it's in the 10" range, but the nice part is that it's cheap to change it out an can be done with normal tools at home. Also, the IRM seems like it should be the only available option. I must be missing something. Who would want to drill a hole and make switching back to 9mm difficult if there was no downside to the IRM version? I think we'll find out more when the patent is finalized and we can really see how it works.

I don't understand your logic. The IRM is more involved to install and remove. Not by much though. Their is no disadvantage to having the hole in the receiver. It effects nothing
 

Mr. Greg

Well-known member
Feedback: 7 / 0 / 0
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
182
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Length of pull is important to me after using the SABRE for years, and so getting the IRM is a no brainer for me. I'm a tiny guy and holding the SABRE with the stock even in the smallest position is a pain.
 

MDG

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 16 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 16, 2009
Messages
731
Location
Alabama
I'm #250 and I thought the IRM would be easier to install. I have 3 M11s and have no problem drilling a hole. The problem is, most of us do not know the ins and outs of this upper in either form.
 

Scossum

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
283
Location
Big D!
I'm number 40 and having seen and test fired both versions, I'll first get the exterior buffer first and drill that hole! I like the flexibility the exterior buffer offers and how easy it was to shoot. But THEN I plan to get back in line so I can get an IRM version too because that video of the MAX-11/15 with the collapsible stock and the 8" barrel is AWESOME!!! :hyper

https://www.facebook.com/LageManufacturing/videos/1677435295676932/
 

mak91

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 7 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
599

agriebel

Well-known member
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
714
Location
Madison WI
I have the system , as it is it does not fit the receiver, I think it will only be a slight mod to make it work. It's one of the things I plan to test out when I get my unit back.
That system is designed to work with milspec uppers, but it doesn't fit any of my billet ar uppers.

Correct, their website says it will not work with billeted uppers.
 

Libertarian_congress

Active member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
26
Location
Atlanta, GA
I wonder if it would be possible to test out both at something like Knob Creek in October. I'm far enough down the list that I'd love a chance to try both before deciding. The hole isn't a deal breaker if there's an obvious advantage, but I'd rather not drill it if I don't have to.
 

MDG

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 16 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 16, 2009
Messages
731
Location
Alabama
I wonder if it would be possible to test out both at something like Knob Creek in October. I'm far enough down the list that I'd love a chance to try both before deciding. The hole isn't a deal breaker if there's an obvious advantage, but I'd rather not drill it if I don't have to.

That was my point earlier. I don't know enough about the two uppers to make a decision. I don't mind drilling a hole but I would like to have more info. At #250 maybe more will come to light.
 

JP87

Well-known member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
48
As it is designed right now, no. I am working on a different IRM design for the M-11A1 and M-10.

I Should be in the first batch for the m11/9 and I can't wait. But the possibility of the IRM working in the m11a1 has me really excited. Max11a1/15k anyone...

n0hPuVU.jpg


HK53k-esque?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top