
I just put in what I am willing to pay and walk away.
.... then ammo was simply re-listed for the next un-suspecting bidder.
this was compiled and presented to GB site owner. they did not want to hear it and took NO ACTION whatsoever
That's what clued me in. There were two identical items that both got bid up an hour before closing. I then got the winning bid on one, and the other was IMMEDIATELY re-listed. Whch I think means the seller had the winning bid on his own item.
Gunbroker allows you to easily relist something. I'll often sell multiple items one after the other so that I don't dilute the market. In this case, the immediate relist would be another of the same item I'm selling. Not saying there aren't funny things going on in your case.
Jake
Correct. But how does an auction item a bidder wins get relisted within an hour after the bidder wins it?The winning bidder would have to be the seller.....
Correct. But how does an auction item a bidder wins get relisted within an hour after the bidder wins it?The winning bidder would have to be the seller.....
Gun broker gives you the option of relisting the item (X) number if times even if its sells, the idea is that you can sell multiples of the same item with out telling would be buyers that you have more than one, its way to make the item look rarer than it is. Some people are more likely to bid more if there is only one of something, if you have 20 of the same item listed there is no reason for buyers to bid up one another , instead they would just bid the opening bid on one of the other auctions. What your seeing is a marketing tactic offered by GB to sellers to help raise the bid price if their items.
That being said foul could be involved, its just not the ONLY option. Like Jake said it only takes a click to relist, I get mobile updates and can relisted literally in under a minute if I sell an item that I have more than 1 of.
He had INDIVIDUAL LISTINGS of both unique items. I won one. Someone else won the other. The other was immediately re - listed for sale. Only possible explanation (I can think of ) is the winning bidder on the other was the seller. If there were winning bids on both, NEITHER should be re-listed for sale.
But true, it doesn't prove anything, and even if it did, it really doesn't matter. Just an observation...
Yeah I would think you could be on to something. Did your transaction with the seller go smoothly?