From what I understand the various US military issued flamethrowers had a 1 "accident" rate in every 100 firings or less, in practice and training. In combat with tracers flying towards your tank (the flamethrower operator tends to draw fire for some reason) I would think the rate is much higher. Now that was with compressed air as the pressurization agent, modern rebuilds use nitrogen so at least you don't have an explosive mix of fuel and air in the tanks.
IF I were so inclined as to use a flamethrower, one of the modern commercial models would be my choice. I would assume the safety features are more numerous as but a single "accident" with one of them and the liability lawsuit would be epic. Uncle Sugar turns one of his recruits into a Crispy Critter, they just pay out the life insurance policy and re-issue it to the next guy in line...
IF I were so inclined as to use a flamethrower, one of the modern commercial models would be my choice. I would assume the safety features are more numerous as but a single "accident" with one of them and the liability lawsuit would be epic. Uncle Sugar turns one of his recruits into a Crispy Critter, they just pay out the life insurance policy and re-issue it to the next guy in line...





