In 2014, what is the best option for supressing a 45ACP UZI?

chipster

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
812
Yes, I searched the archives. Based on who is making what *today* what are the best mount/can options for a 45ACP UZI? (vector with a GG lower to be specific)

I am presuming SBR conversion, all the right paperwork, etc...
 
Last edited:

chipster

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
812
I do hear good things about the Octane 45. I haven't found any UZI specific mounts yet.
 

Garrett

Well-known member
Feedback: 9 / 0 / 0
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
2,843
Location
Michigan
Bowers makes an Uzi mount for his CAC-45. I don't have a .45 setup for my Uzi, but I've run 9mm and .40 through the .45 can. They both suppress very well. The picture shows the CAC-45 below the shorter VERS-9S. The mounts are interchangeable.

E0ECAC34-E953-44EF-ACD2-29862A554F8C_zpsztrzwhez.jpg
 

paragon50

New member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
2
I have an Octane45 HD in Form4 purgatory and agree from my research it would be a strong choice. The Thompson machine sg-2 is another option I learned of after my Octane45 HD purchase. It's a user servicable I'm thinking I need one of these also. One of the admin at NFATalk forum just received his this week, no report on it yet.

http://www.thompsonmachine.net/?page_id=99

When we started the SG project, we decided to build something that no other manufacturer offers; a quiet, tough, mono-core Submachine Gun suppressor that fully and easily disassembles for cleaning (we find this feature to be a necessity due to the large volume of fire and subsequent carbon fouling that subgun cans are subjected to). The SG-2 (new for 2014) has all of the features of our original SG suppressor and adds more. It is shorter and lighter than the original SG, features an ultra-strong threadless-tube design, and now uses the same interchangeable thread adapter systems as our popular Isis-2 and QMF-2 series of suppressors. It is also rated for (and sounds great on) .300BLK rifles and pistols with SUBSONIC ammo. What this all boils down to is a more compact suppressor with greater adaptability. The SG-2 is designed to minimize the blowback and ejection port pop that so commonly is the Achilles Heel of suppressed Submachine Guns. The SG-2 has a very pleasant, low tone and thread adapters are available for every popular subgun, including Macs, Uzis, the TP-9, etc. Thread adapters for the SG-2 are also available in common pistol-caliber thread patterns as well such as 1/2-28, 1/2-36, 5/8-24, etc. On top of all these desirable features, the SG-2 is priced to be affordable for everyone with a subgun to put it on. MSRP is $449.

The SG-2 is available in 9mm or .45. (The .45 bore suppressor is suitable for .40.)

4902.JPG


These guys have it for $368, that would be sub $600 with stamp and transfer.
http://www.silencershop.com/shop/thompson-machine-sg2/
 

paragon50

New member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
2
What mount are you using with the Octane 45 HD and an UZi?

As mentioned my Octane has not cleared yet, I'm expecting to use the 5/8x28 Fixed mount and an adapter.

This is why the thompson machine can is of interest. By the time I buy the mount and adapter for $400 more I can have a dedicated can.

Another option would be to have a spare barrel threaded (5/8x28 thread) and use the fixed barrel adapter.
 

emrisg

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 8 / 0 / 0
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
353
I have both the bowers cac and a Thompson machine sg. Mine are 9mm cans but I like both of them and can't really tell a difference in the sound. Tone is different.

SG can be taken apart for cleaning

Cac has a superior mount in my opinion. The steel mount locks up with the barrel nut retainer and is rock solid. It will not come loose. The sg mount just snugs up on the retainer and can work loose. The sg mount is also aluminum.

Both are great cans but I like the mount on the cac better.
 

jt526

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 23 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Messages
1,069
Location
Dallas, TX
I'm just waitng for silencershop.com to get the vers 9s in stock to get one. I've got an SG (original) and looking for something in between that and an SWR Trident sizewise. I think the vers 9s is just about the right size for my m11/9 and uzi. The mounts on the vers are a huge plus too.
 

chipster

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
812
thanks everyone for the input, going with the CAC-45 for this project.
 

emrisg

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 8 / 0 / 0
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
353
I just remembered bowers is discontinuing the cac series and going with the vers as their subgun can. I just had my baffle stack in my cac 9 upgraded to vers baffles and they told me that.

Great customer service from bowers.
 

Garrett

Well-known member
Feedback: 9 / 0 / 0
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
2,843
Location
Michigan
I just remembered bowers is discontinuing the cac series and going with the vers as their subgun can. I just had my baffle stack in my cac 9 upgraded to vers baffles and they told me that.
I'd heard that, but I do not know if there is a VERS-45 stack developed or in the works. One would assume so, I just hadn't heard.
 

chipster

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
812
Hmm. When I called and asked about BBL length with the CAC-45 nobody mentioned discontinuing the line.
 

HKMP5

Well-known member
Feedback: 9 / 0 / 0
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
415
For a new manufacturer can and uzi specific. Its got to be bowers all the way customer service is amazing!.

Trust me I know I have a costal mims as well works great if it could be threaded on straight lol baffle striking son of a B....
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top