Lage M11/15 Which to get?

tal

Well-known member
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
45
Which model of recoil setup are most people buying? Internal recoil spring or not? Any advantages to one over the other? Thoughts? I got my email and need to have an informed decision on it. Thank you
 

mlaboss

Well-known member
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
60
IRM Advantages:
No hole to drill
Can use any stock

ARRM Advantages:
More options for tuning buffer/spring, especially useful if planning to use "oddball" calibers like 50 beowulf.
Don't have to "latch" the recoil mechanism before removing upper, making disassembly easier

That's all I can think of at the moment. I went with the IRM because I don't plan on using any caliber besides 5.56, and I like the folding "k" stock I have and don't want to change it.
 

Gaujo

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 10 / 0 / 1
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
4,382
Location
Raleigh, NC
mlaboss summarized it well. If you're just going to shoot 556 get the IRM, if you're a garage gunsmith and like to tinker drill the hole.
 

PDXsparky

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 7 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
1,156
Location
Oregon
That's all I can think of at the moment. I went with the IRM because I don't plan on using any caliber besides 5.56, and I like the folding "k" stock I have and don't want to change it.
And no hole. Those are the same reason I'll be getting an IRM version
 

mikillium

Well-known member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Aug 28, 2007
Messages
333
Location
Texas
Tal what number were you? Thanks. I plan on getting the IRM kit. I just don’t see any advantages of the other.
 

tal

Well-known member
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
45
How do you tell the number ? I didn't see it on the email.
 

Fishman

Well-known member
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
589
especially useful if planning to use "oddball" calibers like 50 beowulf.
I've heard so many people say this but 50beo, 458 socom, 450bm, 300blk, 350 legend, 6.8, 224valk and 762x39 all use the same buffers and springs as 223. Tuning the gas block or port size is plenty.
 
Last edited:

DistalRadius

Well-known member
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
1,311
Location
Tennessee
*coughchainsawgripcough*

30121372727_d4f2eacdb2_z.jpg
[/url]DSC07730 by E P, on Flickr[/IMG]
 

Gaujo

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 10 / 0 / 1
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
4,382
Location
Raleigh, NC
I never tire of looking at that chainsaw build. It's the kind of thing you think you'll be doing when you first get into machineguns, but then you get afraid to scratch it.
 
Last edited:

Gaujo

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 10 / 0 / 1
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
4,382
Location
Raleigh, NC
I've heard so many people say this but 50beo, 458 socom, 450bm, 300blk, 350 legend, 6.8, 224valk and 762x39 all use the same buffers and springs as 223. Tuning the gas block or port size is plenty.

The IRM doesn't have a buffer to tune at all, that's the difference.
 

Fishman

Well-known member
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
589
The IRM doesn't have a buffer to tune at all, that's the difference.
Yes, but since it works with 223 it should work will all the calibers that work with standard buffers and springs as well
 

DistalRadius

Well-known member
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
1,311
Location
Tennessee
I never tire of looking at that chainsaw build. It's the kind of thing you think you'll be doing when you first get into machineguns, but then you get afraid to scratch it.

Oh dude, so many scratches. After some point it just doesn't matter anymore. I guess I'll eventually invest in a home parkerizing setup but in the meantime, it just adds character.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top