M11/15 Prototype

Status
Not open for further replies.

ScottinTexas

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 14 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 22, 2015
Messages
2,992
Location
Near Houston, TX
I remain confident that Lage will do the right thing and buyers will suffer no consequences.

The Akins device and this upper are completely unrelated in function and intent. Obviously Lage thinks so too.
 

lokifox

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
276
I think the point is that the BATFE operates on their own terms.

I'm patiently optimistic.
 

M16er

Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
19
I too got on the list, under 200 then found out it was for M11 not M11A1. Gave my spot up. If it does go into M10 M11A1 production, I hope I get added to those lists.
 

IndustrialRescue

Well-known member
Feedback: 4 / 0 / 0
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
696
You must not be aware of the Akins Accelerator story. He, too, had not one but TWO BATFE approval letters, had gone into production and had sold around 200 units before BATFE arbitrarily changed their minds and issued a "cease and desist" order, along with a demand for the names & addresses of all of his customers.

Everyone had to surrender the springs from their stocks, and Tom was devastated financially. It was a classic example of utter lawlessness on the part of a government agency answerable to no one and operating from a position of fear and intimidation.

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/mr-bill-akins-and-the-akins-accelerator/

Historically, the Tech Branch has looked unkindly on conversions that allow pistol caliber receivers to fire rifle caliber rounds. I was pleasantly surprised when the S.A.B.R.E. was approved...and then remained approved.

He had approval letters for an SKS stock. Not his 10/22 stock with a spring. Quit defending the idiot.
 

gt3499a

Well-known member
Feedback: 14 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jul 13, 2004
Messages
523
Has anyone done a spade grip for MAC style receiver commercially? I wonder if a KNS could be adapted?

Scott

dont know of one but here is one m10 solution that someone posted in the past

93AAMac4-2006.jpg93M10-91919clone.jpg

this isnt mine, apologies to forum member ? if they dont want it here
 

gotgraham

Well-known member
Feedback: 7 / 0 / 0
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
173
Location
NV
The KNS setup would mostly work out of the box. Remember, the M11/15 requires the AR buffer tube and the KNS spade setup uses the AR buffer tube to mount. The only part that would be custom would be the trigger linkage - which would be super easy.
 

West_Texas_King

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Sep 28, 2015
Messages
319
The one thing I had not thought of is the water around the gas tube reduced the volume of the gas going to the bolt group. I had to open the gas port in the barrel three numbered drill bit sizes to get the action to function with the jacket full of water.

I wonder, does this keep the BCG a little cooler, having the DI gas essentially chilled before it reaches the gas key on the carrier?
Any observations as to less or more carbon residue as a result of those gasses being cool?
 

Ericoak

Well-known member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
731
Looks like the ATF just reversed itself and declared silencer wipes to be banned, and is forcing Dead Air Armament to cease sales of wipes.
 

LawBob

Well-known member
Feedback: 4 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jul 25, 2009
Messages
3,930
Location
Texas
Looks like the ATF just reversed itself and declared silencer wipes to be banned, and is forcing Dead Air Armament to cease sales of wipes.
They don't have to Cease sales. They just aren't user serviceable and lowers the uniqueness of their product.
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
2,959
Location
Southern New Hampshire
I wonder, does this keep the BCG a little cooler, having the DI gas essentially chilled before it reaches the gas key on the carrier?
Any observations as to less or more carbon residue as a result of those gasses being cool?

There is no significant cooling factor of the gas going into the bolt group. Especially when you pound 500 rounds through the upper in less than a minute. I can tell you, it is hard on the gas rings. My test for gas rings is, with the bolt carrier group out of the gun, pull the bolt forward away from the carrier, then place the bolt group upright on a level surface. If the rings are tight enough to hold the carrier up, they are okay. If the rings can't hold up the carrier, it is time to replace. That 500 rd burst wore out a new set of rings. I was thinking of trying the heavier one piece rings in the water cooled upper.

I used Federal green tip for the 500 rd burst. I lubed the bolt group very heavily before the start. It was pretty black afterwards. If anything, it might be a little dirtier. With the volume being reduced because the gas tube went through the water, the gas port had to be enlarged. This would put a bigger percentage of the propellant gas into the bolt group. So more propellant gas means more powder residue in the receiver.

Scott
 

West_Texas_King

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Sep 28, 2015
Messages
319
There is no significant cooling factor of the gas going into the bolt group. Especially when you pound 500 rounds through the upper in less than a minute. I can tell you, it is hard on the gas rings. My test for gas rings is, with the bolt carrier group out of the gun, pull the bolt forward away from the carrier, then place the bolt group upright on a level surface. If the rings are tight enough to hold the carrier up, they are okay. If the rings can't hold up the carrier, it is time to replace. That 500 rd burst wore out a new set of rings. I was thinking of trying the heavier one piece rings in the water cooled upper.

I used Federal green tip for the 500 rd burst. I lubed the bolt group very heavily before the start. It was pretty black afterwards. If anything, it might be a little dirtier. With the volume being reduced because the gas tube went through the water, the gas port had to be enlarged. This would put a bigger percentage of the propellant gas into the bolt group. So more propellant gas means more powder residue in the receiver.

Scott

Interesting, it does make sense. While it may not cool the gasses, I bet it probably keeps the gas tube from overheating at any rate.
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
2,959
Location
Southern New Hampshire
Interesting, it does make sense. While it may not cool the gasses, I bet it probably keeps the gas tube from overheating at any rate.

Is there a cooling effect? I'm sure there is or I would not have had to open up the gas port to increase volume. But that temperature drop was only a few degrees as the port size was increased by a few thousands of an inch to increase volume for the temperature drop. With over a gallon and a half of water around the barrel and gas tube and another five gallons on the ground with an outboard fuel squeeze bulb as a pump to circulate the water, I don't know as I could afford enough ammo to boil that water away. Yes the gas tube is very safe in the water.

I have found that the limiting factor with a water cooled DI upper has been powder residue in the receiver gumming up the mechanism. Depending on ammo around 800-1,000 rds of use I pull out the bolt/carrier assembly and give it a quick clean and wipe down the inside of the receiver. A piston set up would be cleaner but that would need a gas vent in the middle of the water jacket.

One of my "back burner" projects would be to set up an AR trigger frame for roller locked guns with a KNS spade grip and make a roller locked water cooled host with a 20" barrel. The roller locked mechanism would be cleaner than DI. I also think the roller locked mechanism could be adapted for use with the Valkyrie Armament belt feed mechanism. But that is well beyond this thread.

Scott
 

supperman

Well-known member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
193
I've got the aluminum and some of the parts I need. Its still a ways out and a topic for a new thread M10/08 when the time is right.

QONVIyz.gif

iSpxXFnwJh21z.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top