Junkcollector
Well-known member
If you look at his safety markings a bit closer you'll see the letters and lines were added in the same fashion as the Powder Springs inscription.
You're right I didn't look closely enough.
If you look at his safety markings a bit closer you'll see the letters and lines were added in the same fashion as the Powder Springs inscription.

The part that would drive me crazy is the markings........although it is pretty much verboten to remove/re-engrave markings on an NFA firearm, I'd actually consider writing a letter to the ATF to see if I could have the (identical) markings professionally re-engraved

And what would they say if you wrote them with I have a pistol and the serial # is crooked. May I weld up the original serial # and re-engrave the serial # straight? The answer would be the same. It could very well be that the Tech Branch might be aware of the letters being off from this manufacturer. So if they letters were straight, the Tech Branch might know that the original markings have been removed. If so, that would be very bad. The OP has a functional RR M10. I think sending it to Sam would be a good thing.
Scott

It is my limited understanding that for a Title I firearm, the only marking that can not be altered is the serial #. With a Title II (in this example this RR machinegun) the manufacturer's name, city, state model and serial #. Now if the original manufacturer marked the receiver with hand stamps, even though they were not "Powder Springs" would those still be considered original markings by the Tech Branch? I don't know. But as previously stated even if the owner had a letter as to changing or even removing extraneous markings, if the letter got lost, could the Tech Branch change their ruling? I don't know. But I would rather leave it the way it is than change any markings. That is just opinion.
Scott