Poly Blue Bullets through MAC suppressor?

ktk120

Well-known member
Feedback: 12 / 0 / 0
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
350
What’s the consensus on poly coated Bullets through a Mac suppressor? I see conflicting info on if they lead up. Alor is article sinsee are several years old or more and I know the coating have improved a lot in the last two years
 

strobro32

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 72 / 0 / 0
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
9,126
My personal experience is, it really matters how they are loaded. I've shoot powder coated bullets and Hi-Tek bullets. If the coating is shaved when loading, they will put lead in the can or air. If they are loaded right, they are better than open-back jacketed bullets in reducing lead. If you load your own or buy loaded ammo, pull a few projectiles and see if there is coating missing. Coated bullets do smoke more but if they are loaded right, the smoke is not lead vapor.
 

LawBob

Well-known member
Feedback: 4 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jul 25, 2009
Messages
3,997
Location
Texas
What’s the consensus on poly coated Bullets through a Mac suppressor? I see conflicting info on if they lead up. Alor is article sinsee are several years old or more and I know the coating have improved a lot in the last two years

Speer Lawman fully encapsulated
 

Garrett

Well-known member
Feedback: 9 / 0 / 0
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
2,844
Location
Michigan
My experience shooting a commercial Hi Tek coated bullet hasn’t been very favorable.

Here is a borescope picture after running some through a new, clean barrel.

Axejlb6h.png


I did that after getting so much buildup in a can that a bullet wouldn’t pass through without rubbing the crud. I’m probably lucky I didn’t have a baffle strike that could have wrecked the can.

xzPPWsPh.jpg


And yes, I have pulled several bullets to ensure I was not scraping the coating when loading them.

MELN8gbh.jpg
 

Garrett

Well-known member
Feedback: 9 / 0 / 0
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
2,844
Location
Michigan
So yeah, I don’t shoot poly-coated bullets through cans any more. And once I’m rid of what I have on hand, I don’t plan to buy any more. Not worth it.

There was some thought about getting a better fit for the bullet to the barrel. A “loose” bullet may allow some gas to blow past, burning the coating off. Or at least that’s one theory. So I did an experiment. I didn’t want to crud up another silencer, so I used a Bowers muzzle brake with a removable end cap. I weighed the end cap before and after shooting a number of coated bullets through the brake. I then installed a new end cap and repeated, using a larger bullet. Bullets were .356” and .358” diameters.

The gun used was my Group Uzi with a threaded IMI barrel. 400 rounds of each bullet type were shot for each run. Most shots were semi-auto and short bursts. The barrel was cleaned of buildup between the different loads.

8CUEGSKh.jpg


Results are shown below. The .356” bullets left 2.5x more deposit weight than the .358” bullets. But the larger bullets were still leaving some gunk behind in the barrel and comp.

w8uE9hf.jpg


So I repeated the test again. His time with Berry’s copper plated bullets. The result was negligible buildup: 2.2 grains measured weight increase.

Z8McoFml.jpg


So yeah, I’m sticking with jacketed and copper plated bullets in my silencers.
 

ktk120

Well-known member
Feedback: 12 / 0 / 0
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
350
very interesting. out of curiosity how long ago did you run this test? I know many companies have new formulas of coating in the last year or so that is supposed to be better.
 

strobro32

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 72 / 0 / 0
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
9,126
Great test Garrett. I did the same with my Blackout. Sizing and coating made a big difference. I don't order Leatherman bullets anymore. But my own cast and applied Powder by the Pound poly coated bullets work really well now. I still buy Berrys for the same reason. Much easier, cleaner and faster to load.
 

Garrett

Well-known member
Feedback: 9 / 0 / 0
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
2,844
Location
Michigan
very interesting. out of curiosity how long ago did you run this test? I know many companies have new formulas of coating in the last year or so that is supposed to be better.

The test with the brake was just over two years ago.

The borescope picture inside the barrel is less than 6 months ago with newly purchased bullets.
 

TheColtCollector

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 13 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jun 15, 2015
Messages
1,427
Location
Asheville, NC
I get crazy build up of lead in my suppressors but fuck it’s worth the cost savings. I cast and PC the bullets myself. I do the dip a couple times then chisel off the rest

Nice build up test. I go couple thousand rounds then clean the suppressors.
 

lokifox

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
276
Yikes!

I noticed a significant reduction in buildup when I switched from FMJ to plated. For the price, plated bullets are the way to go.
 

strobro32

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 72 / 0 / 0
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
9,126
Garret did you ever recover the bullets? I would love to see what they looked like. I did testing with recovered bullets to understand alloy hardness, coating, sizing and loading variations. Swimming pools are awesome for more than swimming. There is just too much variation. It is not easy. Plated is just easier and faster and I do most of my reloading with them.

A new world was opened to me when I joined http://castboolits.gunloads.com/forum.php. I spent a year reading about the science and art of casting, loading and coating bullets. I am not an expert and it my be a while before I feel practically competent. One of the things about coated bullets is barrels should be completely cleaned to have the best bore protection. Switching between jacketed, plated and coated bullets is not the best practice.

I spent months of frustration trying to make a bullet that would not foul my 300 blackout. Turned out my Seekins Precision barrel's was out of spec, bore too small. They sent me a replacement. I also want to give Leatherhead Bullets (now a new company) a big thank you for working with me on that. They sent me many different Hi-Tek coated bullets for testing. Another big thank you to many members of other boards who helped.

Here are some teaser pictures from the testing.
28020745825_2ee9f98df8.jpg

35443605673_4ec947d47f.jpg

28121737401_b397a5a14c.jpg

28068867242_b299bdbb3e.jpg

27938795862_83b014463a.jpg

27407143024_4b5d8b8360.jpg

27407163473_eb58b2ec01.jpg

m

27407143124_294ea88e88.jpg

27736821730_0d342d71bd.jpg



Coated bullets are not the best solution but they can be another option, Benefits are cost, easier cleaning, less friction, much less barrel wear, cooler barrels. I'm sure the technology will get better as more manufacturers start selling them.
 
Last edited:

IndustrialRescue

Well-known member
Feedback: 4 / 0 / 0
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
696
I get crazy build up of lead in my suppressors but fuck it’s worth the cost savings. I cast and PC the bullets myself. I do the dip a couple times then chisel off the rest

Nice build up test. I go couple thousand rounds then clean the suppressors.

Get your can CLEAN, and then do the silicone treatment. Will make cleaning way easier.
 

strobro32

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 72 / 0 / 0
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
9,126
Here are more pictures proving how different coatings and coating processes are not equal. Keep in mind that if you can see the lands cut through the coating, there will be lead. I personally think HiTek coated bullets are more likely to cause problems that powder coated bullets. More people sell HiTek because it is easier, faster looks cleaner than PC. I did notice that Federal is selling the PC now.

IMG_20160330_135247_zpssatyulay.jpg

9dc7660f321b9b82e44725814667e63b.jpg
 
Last edited:
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top