What made you choose that angle for the "magazine extension?" Was it entirely based on the angle of the Suomi "feed ramp" on the inside of the drum, transitioning into the stick magazine?
There are 2 angles for the tower. The 1st is the angle side to side on the drum. The 2nd is front to back on the drum. The side angle is determined by the least amount of drag the linked rounds have entering the tower. I used the angle of the bottom finger guide (that diverts the bottom of the cartridges into the tower) for the side to side angle.
The 2nd angle helps the linked rounds to transition to the correct angle of the tower's feed lips. I use the linked rounds to help find the path of least resistance. The ZMAGs are a PITA compared to the Recon Ord/PAM2 mags because the ZMAGs need a divider with a bend in it to help get the cartridges to the feed lips . The bend needs to go at the precise place inside the tower.
The number of linked dummy rounds also change reliability. The fewer the linked dummy rounds, the less the resistance. The slower the ROF, the better the reliability. Which is why MP5. M76, Uzi and Colt Suomi towers work better I think. Shorter towers are easier.
On my first attempt at the ZMAG/Suomi drum, I had more of a forward angle to the tower and the linked rounds seemed to have too much drag I thought. On this 2.0 tower, the angle was not as forward and I compensated with and extra spacer on two linked rounds to get the feed angle. It seemed to work better.