Super Safety (frt) AR15s in 4 calibers, 5.7x28,45acp,9mm and 556

Haris1

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 36 / 0 / 0
Joined
Aug 10, 2018
Messages
492
Hello All;



Because of the ease and reliabilty of the super safeties: I have installed them in AR Pistols with the brace

and full size AR15 rifles.

4 calibers 556, 45acp,9mm and5.7x28

This is one answer to your "M16 fix" None of these will be NFA

If there is any interest, please PM me or order a set which is $155 plus shipping
 
Last edited:

tonelar

Well-known member
Feedback: 10 / 0 / 0
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
659
Location
Texas
i jus bought a DOE looking upper the other day

i wasn’t able to get the complete firearm so i’m trying to make it run with a spikes 9mm lower, currently

so far i’ve been re-positioning the ejector a little at a time
IMG_4958.jpeg
 

scottMO

Well-known member
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
164
I’ve got 3 so far, the PSA KS-47 and Cmmg 5.7 banshee run 100%, the one in the .22 is finicky but that’s normal til I find the right set up.

no regrets!
 

amphibian

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 35 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
4,748
Location
FL
buffers ? h2 and H3 and Miculek hydraulic
I thought the Miculek buffers were magnetic not hydraulic. He bought the patent from Omni Robusta. I have one of the original Omni Robusta buffers and it didn’t work in real FA for me so I don’t use it. I have seen people use my preferred setup of a Tubb 556 flat spring, A5 tube and an RB5007 for both 556 and CMMG RDB setups in 9mm also with SS’s. No changes in your lower
 

ericthered

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jun 19, 2020
Messages
426
The only non hydraulic buffers that behave similar to hydraulic that I know of, would be the Miculek magnetic buffer, and the Cozad spring buffer.
 

amphibian

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 35 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
4,748
Location
FL
The only non hydraulic buffers that behave similar to hydraulic that I know of, would be the Miculek magnetic buffer, and the Cozad spring buffer.
I have both the Miculek and Cozad and neither worked in Full auto for me. The guy from Cozad really tried to bend over backwards for me and sent me several different versions to try and none worked for me.
 

SecondAmend

Well-known member
Feedback: 13 / 0 / 0
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
1,868
I have both the Miculek and Cozad and neither worked in Full auto for me. The guy from Cozad really tried to bend over backwards for me and sent me several different versions to try and none worked for me.
I don't have (or have any interest in getting, for that matter) either the Miculek or Cozad buffers, but this guy apparently has a Miculek buffer set up that works in full auto for at least one caliber:
So the answer for achieving full auto operation might be, "Get a horse."
 

ericthered

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jun 19, 2020
Messages
426
I have the Cozad pcc buffer. With a super safety in 9mm i have not had a single malfunction. If I remember right im using a Strike ind flatwire spring. It runs 1k rpm. But noticeably smoother then all of the other buffers I have tried (standard pcc sliding weight style and Maxim RDB).
 

SecondAmend

Well-known member
Feedback: 13 / 0 / 0
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
1,868
I have the Cozad pcc buffer. With a super safety in 9mm i have not had a single malfunction. If I remember right im using a Strike ind flatwire spring. It runs 1k rpm. But noticeably smoother then all of the other buffers I have tried (standard pcc sliding weight style and Maxim RDB).
Prior to transitioning to hydraulic buffers, for a smooth feel I used DIY tungsten powder buffers similar to those sold by Spikes Tactical. Both types of buffers implement coulombic (i.e., friction) damping for a less abrupt motion of the components.

MHO, YMMV, etc.
 

amphibian

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 35 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
4,748
Location
FL
I have the Cozad pcc buffer. With a super safety in 9mm i have not had a single malfunction. If I remember right im using a Strike ind flatwire spring. It runs 1k rpm. But noticeably smoother then all of the other buffers I have tried (standard pcc sliding weight style and Maxim RDB).
Do you like that high of a cyclic rate? 1K is way too fast for my tastes. I like more around 600 like my FS UZI.
My setup below is running at 553RPM.
https://c3junkie.com/?page_id=1733
I'm in FL so no SS for me but I know this works with the SS as well.
A5-vs-JRC-2.jpg
 

ericthered

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jun 19, 2020
Messages
426
Do you like that high of a cyclic rate? 1K is way too fast for my tastes. I like more around 600 like my FS UZI.
My setup below is running at 553RPM.
https://c3junkie.com/?page_id=1733
I'm in FL so no SS for me but I know this works with the SS as well.

1k is a bit fast as well. I was planning on getting a longer buffer tube and modifying the stroke length as you do. For my sub guns, I prefer around 800 rpm. The way I figure, is that the closer you are to the target, the faster it is practical to have a increased rate of fire. My 5.56 with a 18" barrel, rifle length gas (suppressed), and 4.3oz buffer runs 570-600 depending on ammunition. Which is a comfortable rate for a rifle in my opinion.
 

root

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 56 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Messages
3,848
Has anyone tried a fixed A1 or A2 stock with rifle lenght buffer?
I'm using a CMMG A1 stock & fifle buffer with a rarebreed 1st gen 2 position on a 30 carbine upper.

It chugs along about as fast as my Lage slowfire uppers.
I need to get the shot timer out for a real round count per minute.
It's really pleasant to shoot at the slower speed though.
 

amphibian

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 35 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
4,748
Location
FL
Has anyone tried a fixed A1 or A2 stock with rifle lenght buffer?
I'm using a CMMG A1 stock & fifle buffer with a rarebreed 1st gen 2 position on a 30 carbine upper.

It chugs along about as fast as my Lage slowfire uppers.
I need to get the shot timer out for a real round count per minute.
It's really pleasant to shoot at the slower speed though.
Yes, I have done some testing with rifle length buffer tubes and buffers. I won 3rd place at the Knob Creek SMG match in like 2006 using a rifle length tube and an Olympic Arms Pneumatic buffer. Those are great till they leak which is pretty soon. I had two of them and they both didn't make it past like 2000 rounds. They required a rifle length buffer tube. There is also the Armanov buffer which I think also requires the rifle length.

Fast forward to today, I don't really have any configurations that I feel like I must use a rifle length tube.

Also bear in mind that you can have two configurations running the exact same cyclic rate and one is smooth and the other isn't.

I don't know if you are familiar with the Ferfrans RRS carrier but it will drop the cyclic rate in whatever you setup you have by another 200 RPM. However, I personally think it feels weird. Like the 'harmonic's' are off. Like I'm waiting for the round to go off but the cadence is off from the mechanical delay. Maybe it is just me as I have another friend that loves it.
I don't think it has anything to do with the rate as I have other setups that I have clocked at the same cyclic rate and they feel smoother to me.
 

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top