yzfchet
UZI Talk Instigator, UZI Talk Life Member,
Trying to see if there is a correlation between SWD M11/9 and SWD M11A1 (.380) SMG manufacturing years and magazine wells which appear to be tight when using Shockwave Z-Mag, Suomi dual feed, or PAM II magazines. If you have an M11/9 or M11A1 SMG which has had fitment problems with any of the mentioned mags dropping free without sanding or otherwise adjusting the mags, please select the type of SMG and poll year of your TIGHT SMG in the poll.
If your M11/9 or M11A1 SMG has NOT had any tight magazine problems with any or all of the above mentioned after-market magazines, please select the type of SMG and poll year for your NO PROBLEMS SMG.
If you have multiple SWD SMGs please select as many choices as are applicable to you. If you have multiple SMGs of the same year with different TIGHT or NO PROBLEM magwell conditions, please note specifics as a message in the thread.
Thanks for your participation!
PLEASE NOTE: This poll is not applicable for the MAC 10/9 or MAC11 SMGs manufactured by Ingram; only for the Sylvia Williams (or "and Wayne" if you subscribe to alternate history information) Daniel M11/9 or M11A1 SMGs.
If your M11/9 or M11A1 SMG has NOT had any tight magazine problems with any or all of the above mentioned after-market magazines, please select the type of SMG and poll year for your NO PROBLEMS SMG.
If you have multiple SWD SMGs please select as many choices as are applicable to you. If you have multiple SMGs of the same year with different TIGHT or NO PROBLEM magwell conditions, please note specifics as a message in the thread.
Thanks for your participation!
PLEASE NOTE: This poll is not applicable for the MAC 10/9 or MAC11 SMGs manufactured by Ingram; only for the Sylvia Williams (or "and Wayne" if you subscribe to alternate history information) Daniel M11/9 or M11A1 SMGs.
Last edited:



