It is my understanding that the cam path change is to give the carrier more thrust for improved cycling in the CMMG system. I own both CMMG 9mm and 45 upper. At least on a visual inspection, I don't see a difference between the two carriers, but I do see a significant difference in cam path geometry between the CMMG RDB carriers and standard 5.56 carriers. Since the Max-11/15 uses standard AR-15 style carriers, that might be an easier swap?
Could some kind of .45 caliber conversion be done with the Max-/15 series? I would think so, but IMHO there will be significant lack of mag capacity, and mechanical/engineering limitations to current AR-15 based systems.
This is my opinion, but straight blowback .45 sucks. Because of the mass of the 230 grain bullet, the increased dwell time transfers more energy into the bolt/buffer combination. To keep the bolt closed, because of the increased dwell time, the mass of the bolt/ buffer combination must be increased. This increase in mass tends to have more energy in the bolt/buffer combination when it strikes the end of the buffer tube. I didn't find the experience pleasant, especially in full auto. Direct impingement is much more pleasant, but is very close to the minimum amount of gas for function. At least with my early RWE upper, ejection is very weak. Rotary delayed blowback has stronger ejection than my DI, but has a custom carrier with a different geometry of the cam path.
There is also the limitation of the standard magwell structure for .45 caliber magazines. Macon Armory has custom built 20 round steel magazines. Promag makes a steel Uzi style .45 magazine with 22 round capacity. There are a couple of different polymer UMP .45 style magazines available, but maximum capacity is 25 rounds. I also recall some guys cutting the additional plates off the sides of Grease Gun mags and squeezing them in a vice ever so slightly to get them to fit into an AR magwell. For those pursuing .45 in a Max-/15 upper, I sincerely wish you luck.
Scott