There seem to be no imported real Uzi's. Everything is a conversion. In my eyes anyway a slotted bolt isn't a limitation but some people care about being "as close as possible" to military issue.
In regarding 22, it's mostly a pain in the butt in all guns that can do it as a secondary caliber. You end up having to run CCI minimags for the additional energy it puts in the system to make it run, and those costs as much as 9 mm. So at the end of day it's like why am I doing this?
I'm a shooter, not a collector so for 19k, I'd get a bolt in 9mm for 11k and a second mac10 in .45, or a resiling or spitfire.
Most bolts prob have a host, and you could have the most perfect host in the world made for it from raw parts for reasonable money if you care.
There seem to be no imported real Uzi's. Everything is a conversion. In my eyes anyway a slotted bolt isn't a limitation but some people care about being "as close as possible" to military issue.
In regarding 22, it's mostly a pain in the butt in all guns that can do it as a secondary caliber. You end up having to run CCI minimags for the additional energy it puts in the system to make it run, and those costs as much as 9 mm. So at the end of day it's like why am I doing this?
There are pre 68 fully transferrable IMI UZI's....but I'm sure they are extremely pricey these days.
IMHO, as a shooter, I would definitely want a RR or even registered sear vs a bolt.
The 22LR UZI kits are pretty reliable. I never used Mini Mags in mine. I just use Federal bulk pack.
I also like running GG mags to run .40SW or .45ACP.
I think BarrelXchange may have also done some .357 Sig barrels as well.
I have buddy that runs his transferrable full size in 10mm as well with GG mags.
If you can use federal bulk pack you're living the .22 dream. Is that typical for .22 kits? If uzis can reliably run bulk pack .22 that would be cheaper than a 10/22 or american 180